AI-Assisted Data Labeling with Human Expertise

Data labeling, which is fundamental for building artificial intelligence systems, has often been an intricate, tedious, and physically demanding undertaking. AI-assisted data labeling is a form of automated data labeling, representing a game-changing approach that utilizes the power of artificial intelligence to accelerate the crucial step of data labeling in machine learning.

AI-assisted data labeling promises to reshape how we annotate vast datasets, making the procedure swifter and more productive. Although, to be able to show its full potential it still needs guidance. In this article, we will explore what AI-assisted data labeling is, its benefits, challenges, the necessity of human input when working with such AI labeling tools, and its role in shaping the future of AI.

Get high-quality data. Fast.

Try Toloka Hybrid Labeling for image, audio, or text annotation from LLM+Humans in 40+ languages

Talk to us

The Essence of Data Labeling

Before we delve into the intricacies of AI-assisted data labeling, let's first understand why data labeling is so essential. In supervised machine learning, models are trained on labeled datasets to make predictions or classifications. These labels serve as the ground truth, enabling algorithms to learn and generalize from the provided examples. Whether it's image segmentation, sentiment analysis in text, or predicting stock prices, labeled data is the core of AI.

Manual Data Labeling

Traditionally, data labeling, also known as annotation, has been a manual endeavor, where human annotators carefully examine and label data points one by one. The primary goal of the annotation process is to create labeled datasets that can be later employed to train machine learning models, particularly supervised learning models. Such data is indispensable for training AI algorithms to recognize and make predictions about specific patterns or objects within data.

Manual labels are generated by individuals or teams of annotators who review, analyze data, and then apply labels to it based on predefined guidelines or criteria. In some cases, manual labeling tasks require domain expertise. Annotators with subject matter knowledge are better equipped to handle specialized labeling tasks.

Data Labeling Tasks

Manual labeling is used in a wide range of data labeling tasks, including but not limited to:

• Text classification. Assigning categories or tags to text documents;
• Sentiment analysis. Labeling text data with sentiments such as positive, negative, or neutral;
• Image annotation. Adding bounding boxes, object labels, or key points to raw images;
• Named entity recognition (NER). Identifying and labeling named entities in text, such as names of people, organizations, and locations;
• Speech recognition. Transcribing spoken language into written text. Manual data labeling is effective, although compared to AI automation it is slow, expensive, and prone to human errors and biases. As the scale of data and the complexity of AI applications grow, it becomes increasingly challenging to rely solely on manual labeling.

AI-Assisted Automated Data Labeling

AI-assisted data labeling is a shift in the automated labeling paradigm. It combines the strengths of human judgment and AI automation to label data competently and accurately. This automated labeling approach involves machine learning algorithms to help humans label or annotate large datasets more efficiently and accurately.

Automated labeling typically encompasses two main approaches: one where an AI system autonomously labels raw data, and the other where AI is integrated into annotation applications to expedite and enhance manual labeling procedures. Here by AI-assisted labeling we mean AI systems that employ automated annotation.

In that approach, machines can precisely label the most basic components after their training is complete. Manual labeling is only required for challenging issues. And it still will be less time-consuming than fully manual labeling.

While AI-assisted data labeling can automate and streamline many aspects of the annotation process, it is typically most effective when used as a tool to augment people's capabilities rather than replace them entirely. The ideal approach involves a combination of AI and human effort, with AI handling repetitive and straightforward tasks while humans provide expertise, context, and oversight.

Benefits of AI-Assisted Data Labeling

Here are some key advantages of AI-assisted data labeling:

Scalability and complex data processing. AI-assisted labeling solutions can easily scale to handle large and diverse datasets. Whether it's thousands or millions of data points, AI can manage the workload efficiently. AI algorithms also can handle complex data types, such as images, audio, and text, making them suitable for a wide range of AI applications across various industries;

Speed and Efficiency. AI-assisted data labeling significantly accelerates the labeling process. With the assistance of AI algorithms, large sets of data can be labeled much faster than relying solely on manual labor;

Cost Reduction. By automating parts of the labeling process, organizations can reduce the overall cost of data preparation. This is especially important for businesses looking to manage their budgets effectively while still employing the power of AI;

Expertise Augmentation. Annotators still play a crucial role in the labeling process by verifying AI-generated labels. AI doesn't replace humans but complements their skills, making the overall process more accurate and efficient;

Resource Allocation. By automating routine labeling tasks, organizations can allocate their human resources to more complex and creative aspects of data analysis and model development, maximizing the value of their workforce;

Enhanced Productivity. AI-assisted labeling allows machine learning engineers to focus on designing and fine-tuning machine learning model rather than spending excessive time on manual data preparation.

Is It Possible to Fully Eliminate Human Input While Doing AI-Assisted Labeling?

AI-assisted data labeling can significantly reduce the amount of human input required in the traditional manual labeling process, but it is challenging to fully eliminate human involvement, particularly in sophisticated and nuanced tasks. Such assignments often involve subtle sophisticated elements that may be difficult for AI systems to handle accurately. Human judgment and domain expertise are essential for handling ambiguity, understanding context, and making decisions in such cases.

Human Involvement in Labeling Pipeline

That’s what humans can do to ensure the quality and effectiveness of machine learning models:

Evaluate model output

After training and testing the model, labelers review and analyze the model outputs in conjunction with the ground truth labels. They calculate and interpret the evaluation metrics to assess model performance accurately.

Experts compare and make informed decisions about which model performs best based on the evaluation metrics. Commonly used metrics encompass:

• accuracy - the ratio of correct predictions;
• precision - true positives over total predicted positives;
• recall - true positives divided by total predicted positives;
• F1 score - harmonic mean of precision and recall;
• area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC-ROC).

Data scientists consider these or some other task-specific metrics to select the model that aligns with the project's goals. Also, humans bring domain-specific knowledge to the table, which is often crucial for interpreting model outputs. They can identify cases where the model may be making false positives or negatives due to domain-specific nuances. In situations where models struggle to make accurate predictions, experts can provide additional guidance and insight. They can review and potentially re-label ambiguous or challenging data points.

Fine-tune open-source model

Open-source models are often trained on generic sets and may not be tailored to the specific requirements of your task. Human labeler can curate a specific set that precisely reflects the nuances, context, and goals of your project, ensuring that the model's performance is aligned with your specific needs.

Such training sets are called gold standard datasets. They consist of high-quality, accurately labeled data that serves as a reference or benchmark for model training and evaluation. Fine-tuning a model on such sets allows an automated labeling system to adapt to the specific characteristics and requirements of a particular task or dataset.

Humans can provide accurate and high-quality annotations for the gold standard set. These annotations serve as a reference or benchmark for training and evaluating the model. High-quality data is essential for achieving the desired level of model performance.

Fine-tuning allows the incorporation of domain-specific knowledge and expertise into the automated labeling process. Experts can guide the fine-tuning process by providing feedback on model predictions, addressing domain-specific challenges, and mitigating potential biases.

Creating a golden set also allows for iterative refinement. As you fine-tune the model and gain insights from its performance, you can revisit, update, or modify the golden set to improve system accuracy over time. This approach is invaluable for achieving successful results in machine learning projects with the use of open-source models.

Model-Assisted Labeling with the Help of LLM

LLM is a valuable asset for text-specific tasks and data labeling as well. LLMs can generate annotations quickly, significantly reducing the time required for labeling compared to manual annotation. However, human oversight remains essential for quality control and ensuring the accuracy of annotations, especially when it comes to complex tasks where models may not perform adequately on their own.

Complex tasks often involve ambiguous content or borderline cases that LLMs may have issues with. Humans can resolve ambiguity and provide nuanced annotations based on their judgment and expertise. They play a critical role in QA by reviewing and verifying the accuracy of the labels generated by the LLM, ensuring that the data meets the high standards of the project.

By working alongside an LLM, users can provide feedback to improve the model's performance. They can identify areas where the machine learning algorithms make errors and suggest corrective actions or refinements. It can also be highly cost-effective, as it reduces the need for extensive manual labeling and model training iterations.

Acquiring Labeled Data with Large Language Models

Labeling with the help of large language models involves using them to generate annotations or labels for various types of content, primarily textual. It mainly works the following way:

1. Users provide an input prompt or instruction to the LLM, specifying the task and what they want the LLM to annotate;
2. LLM generates initial annotations or labels for the presented data, which helps expedite the labeling process.

At first glance, all looks great: data scientists obtain a labeled dataset for further processing as a result of LLM annotation. However, that's not all. It's essential to have annotators review and validate the labels generated by the LLM. Reviews ensure that the generated annotations are accurate and meet the desired quality standards.

The reason for this is that while large language models are powerful and versatile, they are not without limitations and challenges that can make them imperfect and often unsuitable for practical applications in certain contexts. Here are some of the key reasons why large language models may have limitations:

• LLMs can inherit biases present in their training sets. In specialized applications, these biases may lead to corrupted or inappropriate responses, affecting correctness and fairness;
• LLMs are primarily trained on generic texts, which may not include or include not enough domain-specific or industry-specific knowledge. In specialized tasks, such as medical diagnosis or legal document analysis, this lack of domain expertise can result in incorrect or insufficient information.

Specialized tasks often require a substantial amount of annotated data to train accurate models. For instance, specific or business-oriented ones may include industry slang or terminology that LLMs may not understand or use accurately. The simple fact that they may lack access to a sufficient amount of such information, makes them less effective for these tasks.

To address these limitations, businesses often require a combination of LLMs and expert input to ensure correctness, reliability, and practicality in business-specific tasks. In order for LLMs to thoroughly perform tasks for particular companies they need to be fine-tuned on additionally labeled domain-specific datasets that are tailored to these organizations’ needs.

Additional annotation can significantly enhance the overall performance of LLMs by addressing some of their limitations and improving their capabilities, making them more effective in domains or applications where they may not perform optimally out of the box. Customized LLMs are more practical and effective in delivering domain-specific content and responses.

Labels provided by domain experts help LLMs understand and generate more accurate and relevant content, thereby enhancing performance and correctness. By continually updating and refining annotations based on real-world usage and feedback, LLMs can undergo iterative improvement, leading to better performance and practicality over time.

The Future of AI-Assisted Data Labeling

AI-assisted annotation is already helping to streamline manual labeling, however, it is not yet possible to completely eliminate the help of trained professionals. This is due to the fact that the current AI-assisted labeling methods, though having evolved and improved their capabilities over the last few years, are still not able to handle all challenges properly. This is especially true for applications involving complex issues that are specific to certain industries, including business.

The current state of technology cannot eliminate the need for human involvement in data labeling. As AI models continue to improve, we can expect even more sophisticated AI-assisted labeling tools to emerge, further revolutionizing the field of AI and enabling groundbreaking applications across various domains.

While it's challenging to predict the future of technology with certainty, it's probable that we may see more automation and reduced labelers' involvement in annotation. The extent to which complete automation will be achieved will likely vary depending on the multitude of considerations. Nonetheless, even as technology progresses, human experience, judgment, and supervision will likely continue to be required to ensure accuracy and quality in many data labeling scenarios.